There are more cars on the roads these days and more accidents are happening. As a result, some politicians have suggested that people should take regular driving tests throughout their lives, rather than one single test. What do you think are the advantages of repeat driving tests? Do these outweigh the disadvantages?
– Bài viết mẫu IELTS –
Sample Answer 1: (Drawbacks outweigh the advantages)
In most of the countries, people take a driving test before they are awarded the driving licence and renewal of driving licence does not require the person to retake the test. Some politicians, however, suggest that repetitive test should replace the ‘test once in a lifetime’ policy. Undeniably, the proposed policy has some advantages but the drawbacks are far greater.
To begin with, the recursive driving test seems like a solution to the increasing driving offence but in reality, people’s carelessness, violation of traffic rules and driving under the influence are the main causes for most of the accidents. Therefore the authorities should spend more money and manpower for ensuring road safety than retesting driver’s ability. It is a scientific fact that adept drivers are less likely to forget their driving skill unless they get physically unfit. Considering this, the authority should update the drivers about the changes of traffic rules, not test their ability to drive a vehicle. Moreover, strict punishment and penalty should be imposed for the traffic rule violation.
Furthermore, a periodic driving test would kill people’s money, time and energy on the one hand and drain the government’s budget on the other hand. According to a recent report, new applicants have to wait for several weeks to get a driving licence due to the insufficient facility and manpower. Having the repetitive driving skill test would thus make this far worse.
To conclude, rather than questing people’s ability to remember how to drive, strict policies and road safety should get priority. Driver’s should be educated not tested on their ability to drive a car as this proposed policy would add burden both to the ordinary people and the authority.
Sample Answer 2: (Benefits outweigh the disadvantages)
The growing number of cars and reckless driving are the major causes of increasing road accidents these days. Therefore, some people, as well as some politicians, express their view that repetitive driving tests, not just once to get the licence, should be in place. This essay presents my views in favour of the continuous testing process for driving with some appropriate reasons and examples.
The road safety in a country is a major concern and so is the obligation of politicians regarding this. This is because increasing vehicular movements can cause more accidents on the roads. Additionally, drivers, on the other hand, get outdated to incorporate with road rules accurately. For example, they may not be able to see the traffic signals and road signs easily when they get older. As a result, such drivers may potentially hit other moving vehicles and the people. Therefore, the repeat tests for driving, from time to time, will definitely improve the driving accuracy of people. Moreover, in many countries young drivers often do not abide by the traffic rules and having continuous tests would ensure their awareness in safe driving. Finally, when people will have to take driving tests periodically, they will less likely violate any traffic rule.
However, the multiple tests for driving in our lifetime may unnecessarily impose a burden. This is because we have to prepare for the test in order to renew the licence. Additionally, we will have to pay the exam fees every time which is considered an unwanted expense by many. As a result, many of us may tend to avoid the tests and this will lead to a situation that one day we will get pulled over and fined for an outdated licence. Therefore, continuous tests may not solve the raised issue easily while the drivers will always be under a pressure.
In conclusion, as reoccurring tests improve our driving accuracy, the benefits of such test surpass the drawbacks.
[Written by – Kris Nirvana]Sample Answer 3:
The number of cars on roads is increasing rapidly these days which is aligned with the number of car accidents. Consequently, some authorities believe that all driving licence holders must take driving tests every year, rather than doing it once in their life. The following essay will discuss the positive and the negative sides of the routine test, but I do believe that it has more benefits than drawbacks.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that doing a driving test annually would have some disadvantages. One of the reasons is the time and preparation it would require. In addition, people would have to pay every year for taking the test. Lastly, they also believe that it would cost more for the government, as they must provide additional manpower in the driving test centres.
Despite all the negative sides, performing a driving test on an annual basis would have some benefits for everybody. Firstly, by having a yearly driving test, each driver would be refreshed and updated with all driving regulations. Secondly, drivers would be more cautious and more careful when they drive, as their license will be checked regularly. Thirdly, it will reduce the number of traffic accidents, because the driver’s physical condition would also be checked as a part of the test. For example, each driver’s eyesight would be examined as some driver might have problems with their views.
In conclusion, it is indisputable that performing a driving test each year has its own drawbacks, but I do believe that it has more benefits for everybody. By doing the test regularly, people will be more aware and cautious of their driving style which will reduce the number of accidents.
– Bài viết mẫu IELTS writing band 9 , bài IELTS essays mẫu band 9 , bài viết mẫu ielts band 9 , ielts writing task 2 , học viết ielts writing task 2, học viết ielts, học ielts online , cách viết bài ielts
–